> That's a bit simplistic. The nett result of EPR/Bell/Aspect is either-
> indeterminism-or-nonlocal-hidden-variable. If NLHV's can be disproved,
> that proves indeterminism

Actually there is a third alternative, which is to take the time
symmetry of physical law seriously, as suggested by Huw Price in
"Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point". That explains all the above (EPR/
Bell/Aspect) without any additional assumptions such as FTL
signalling, causality violation, hidden variables etc. (Bell himself
admitted that this was the only loophole in his argument.)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to