-----Original Message----- 
From: meekerdb 
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 7:35 PM 
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com 
Subject: Re: The Brain on Trial 

On 6/27/2011 8:56 AM, Rex Allen wrote:
> And it seems like the question can only be answered by trying out 
> approaches like those described in the article.
> You seem to have already made up your mind though.  No testing or 
> evidence required - Brent has spoken.
> Rex

Not at all.  I'm all for trying such methods.  But that doesn't 
invalidate my point that there are reasons for punishment, deterrence 
and prevention of feuds, that are not dependent on some theory of 
personal culpability or deterring re-offense.

And no I'm not for returning to public punishments, and especially not 
executions and corporal punishments.  By coarsening public empathy they 
probably produced more crime than they deterred.  In fact I worry that 
the harshness of our overcrowded prisons may also have the effect of 
producing more recidivism.



Why does it seem that there is no motivation to consider the victims of 
criminal behavior?

    The article that was originally posted seemed to imply a start of a chain 
of reasoning that leads inevitably toward arguing for a government control 
mechanism where *any* behavior can be declared to be criminal and thus in need 
of adjustment. The ban on smoking that is occurring in the US is a good example 
of this, IMHO! A secular version of a theocracy, for example. The movie 
Equilibrium (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0238380/ ) comes to mind.
     The main problem that I see in such schemes is that they inevitably lead 
to situations where a small elite decide what is and what is acceptable 
behavior, i.e. tyranny. Only when the individual is self-incentivized to "to 
the right thing" do I see a general diminution of criminal behaviors. But such 
requires that the true causes of criminal behavior be identified and minimized 
at an individual level, not by some state institution. If criminal behavior is 
the result of natural predilections within humans then are we going to have to 
genetically engineer out criminality? 
    Perhaps there is no complete solution to criminality, maybe there are just 
various methods that work in some cases and fail in others.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to