On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 25, 8:32 am, Stathis Papaioannou <stath...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The replacement neurons are integrated so that they interact with the
>> rest of the brain just as normal brain tissue would. An example is the
>> one you came up with, neurons without their nucleus, which would
>> function normally at least for a few minutes.
> If they can only function for a few minutes, then that function may
> not be 'normal' to anything except us as distantly removed observers.
You've missed the point.
>> If any of those things happened you would say, "Hey, things look
>> strange!" But you can't say this, because the normal brain tissue,
>> including the neurons that enable speech, receive normal input from
>> the replacement neurons. So either everything looks just the same, or
>> everything looks different but you can't be aware of any difference.
>> (Please don't say that they *don't* receive normal input, because that
>> is the entire point of the thought experiment establishing
> They may receive some normal input, but there may be a lot more input
> which we have no way to understand from our perceptual distance which
> gets amputated.
You've completely missed the point again. Perhaps you could try
reading Chalmers' paper if you haven't already done so:
Unfortunately some people just don't seem to understand it.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at