On Dec 31 2011, 10:51 pm, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
> > On Dec 31, 4:17 pm, meekerdb<meeke...@verizon.net>  wrote:

> I thought it was obvious how they are related.  A computation that doesn't 
> replicate
> certain functions, like recognizing danger, ends up having a small measure 
> (if comp is true).

That's part of why I don't think comp is true. I don't really see how
it could conceive of danger in the first place.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to