On 12/31/2011 7:31 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Dec 31, 4:17 pm, meekerdb<[email protected]> wrote:
It's not a computational justification, it's an evolutionary one. People just
like you
are ones you can mate with and propagate genes which you likely share. Strange
people are
less likely to share your genes, but being people they will likely compete for
the same
resources.
Under comp, wouldn't all evolutionary justifications have to
ultimately be computational justifications?
I thought it was obvious how they are related. A computation that doesn't replicate
certain functions, like recognizing danger, ends up having a small measure (if comp is true).
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
