On 12/31/2011 7:31 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Dec 31, 4:17 pm, meekerdb<meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
It's not a computational justification, it's an evolutionary one. People just
are ones you can mate with and propagate genes which you likely share. Strange
less likely to share your genes, but being people they will likely compete for
Under comp, wouldn't all evolutionary justifications have to
ultimately be computational justifications?
I thought it was obvious how they are related. A computation that doesn't replicate
certain functions, like recognizing danger, ends up having a small measure (if comp is true).
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at