On 8/6/2012 5:29 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
? Why? It's not complicated! A person must be, at least, nameable. A person has always has a name.


Otherwise he is identifiable only by description and then there is no uncertainty about Bruno-in-Helsinki becoming Bruno-in-Washington or Bruno-in-Moscow; they are all uniquely identified only by description. That was the whole crux of your argument with John Clark.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to