In this post the editing differences are washed away, the statements melt
together with the responses to them.
I was careful to use different font-distinctions and it all came out here
like a mud. I think that is unfair.
John Mikes

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Roger Clough <rclo...@verizon.net> wrote:

>  Hi Richard Ruquist
>
> Capitalism is not a form of morality unless you consider
> expanding the wealth of an entire nation to be moral.
>
>
> Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
> 9/5/2012
> Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him
> so that everything could function."
>
> ----- Receiving the following content -----
> *From:* Richard Ruquist <yann...@gmail.com>
> *Receiver:* everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
> *Time:* 2012-09-04, 16:23:46
> *Subject:* Re: There is no such thing as cause and effect
>
>   What struck me is that the "the USERS of wealth in directing the life
> of the country."
> seem to be exporting jobs overseas and hiding their money there as well.
> Richard
>
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:12 PM, John Mikes 
> <jami...@gmail.com<+jami...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> > First to Bruno's response to
> >
> > (R):3) It's also probably why taxing the rich ultimately doesn''t work,
> it
> > lowers every body's income to fit the curve. A nd why trickle down
> doesn't
> > work.
> >
> > "I do agree with this. The leftist idea of distributing richness cannot
> work
> > for many reasons. But richness must be based on facts, and not on
> > propaganda. Today we are living a perversion of capitalism, because too
> much
> > investment are money stealing in disguise. The whole oil, and military
> > industries, jail systems, and pharmaceutical industries are build on
> sands.
> > It will crumbled down, and the sooner the better. But it will take time
> as
> > the most of the middle class and banks are hostage (not always
> knowingly) of
> > professional liars."
> >
> > It is a 'trap' to falsify the adequate taxing of the 'rich' as a leftist
> > attempt to distributing richness. It does not include more than a
> > requirement for THEM to pay their FAIR share - maybe more than the
> > not-so-rich layers (e.g. higher use of transportation, foreign
> connections,
> > financial means, etc. - all costing money to the country) in spite of
> their
> > lower share in the present unjust taxation-scheme.
> >
> > The rest of your reply is appreciable, however the 'crumbling' down may
> only
> > follow a total disaster for the not-so-rich people.
> >
> > The said 'taxing' is not a 'trickle down' trick, it is providing the
> > (missing) means to society to stay healthy and sane.
> > (JM)
> >
> > Now to Brent's addendum:
> >
> > I agree - although Brent, too, has fallen into the trap of a
> misidentified
> > problem-view: the equalization of wealth, a 200 year obsolete idea that
> > cannot work for several reasons. Socialism (not to even mentioning
> > communism) are never realized (realizable?) dreams of idealists (calling
> > themselves "materialists").
> >
> > Then again I would not identify 'the rich' as
> > "...people who live comfortably solely on their investments..."
> > which may not be objectionable (ppensioners, etc.) but the USERS of
> wealth
> > in directing the life of the country. Though they may do so, they should
> > contribute from their share of fortune to the expenses.
> > And PLEASE, Brent, do not even utter in econo-political discussion the
> word
> > "FAIRNESS"!
> >
> > John M
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:29 PM, meekerdb 
> > <meeke...@verizon.net<+meeke...@verizon.net>>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 9/3/2012 8:06 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >>
> >> 3) It's also probably why taxing the rich ultimnately doesn''t work,
> >> it lowers everybody's income to fit the curve. A nd why trickle
> >> down doesn't work.
> >>
> >>
> >> I do agree with this. The leftist idea of distributing richness cannot
> >> work for many reasons. But richness must be based on facts, and not on
> >> propaganda. Today we are living a perversion of capitalism, because too
> much
> >> investment are money stealing in disguise. The whole oil, and military
> >> industries, jail systems, and pharmaceutical industries are build on
> sands.
> >> It will crumbled down, and the sooner the better. But it will take time
> as
> >> the most of the middle class and banks are hostage (not always
> knowingly) of
> >> professional liars.
> >>
> >>
> >> I'm not sure what is meant by 'taxing the rich doesn't ultimately work'?
> >> If it means it doesn't produce equality and prosperity, I'd agree. But
> in
> >> the U.S. the tax rate paid by the rich has been higher (even much
> higher) in
> >> the past and at the same time there was prosperity and economic growth.
> Now
> >> the rich (by which I mean people who live comfortably solely on their
> >> investments) pay a lower tax rate than the poorest working person. So
> >> 'taxing the rich' can certainly work in the sense of fairness.
> >>
> >> Brent
> >>
> >> --
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Everything List" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to 
> > everything-list@googlegroups.com.<+everything-list@googlegroups.com.>
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.<+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.>
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to 
> everything-list@googlegroups.com.<+everything-list@googlegroups.com.>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+
> unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. <+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to