You outsiders cannot really know how "out-of-topic" this fallacy may be. It is an attempt to use money for dulling the human mind. Really no relationship to the list's aims. JohnM
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 15 Sep 2012, at 22:32, John Clark wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 11, Russell Standish <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I know this might be an impossible dream, but could we keep the list >> clear of parochial US election discussion, as it is clearly off-topic. >> > > How could anything be off topic on the everything list? > > > > LOL > > Of course, on the everything-list we discuss about the search for a theory > of everything, which is a very *particular* thing. > > Some things can be invoked, only if it seems to be a counter-example to a > TOE proposal. > > It is doubtful we found a theory explaining all observable forces, from > gravitation to love, which would be contradicted by the US election. > Russell Standish was correct. US election are out of topic. > > Oh! You can use US election and international cannabis prohibition as > illustrating a giant innumeracy: a lack in elementary logic education, > which does not help for the unification quest. > > > Bruno > > > > http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
