Stephan, The compactified dimensions curl-up into particles that resemble a crystalline structure with some peculiar properties compared to ordinary particles, but nevertheless just particles.
What about that do you not understand? Richard On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Stephen P. King <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/24/2012 10:20 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote: >> >> Nonsense Stephan, >> I totally agree with everything you copied over >> but totally disagree with your interpretation of it. >> Richard > > > OK, please tell me how else the math is to be understood. > >> >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Stephen P. King <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 10/24/2012 2:35 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote: >>> >>> I do not understand what you are saying here. >>> The compact manifolds are 10^90/cc, 1000 Planck-length, 6-d particles >>> in a 3-D space. >>> >>> http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Calabi-Yau_manifold#Calabi-Yau_manifolds_in_string_theory >>> . >>> How can those 6d dimensions be orthogonal to 3D space? >>> I admit that it is a conjecture that each particle maps the universe >>> instantly. >>> So if you have a means to falsify that conjecture I would like to hear >>> about >>> it. >>> Richard >>> >>> Hi Richard, >>> >>> The strings are not free moving particles! From the link: >>> >>> "To make contact with our 4-dimensional world, it is expected that the >>> 10-dimensional space-time of string theory is locally the product M4×X of >>> a >>> 4-dimensional Minkowski space M3,1 with a 6-dimensional space X . The >>> 6-dimensional space X would be tiny, which would explain why it has not >>> been >>> detected so far at the existing experimental energy levels. Each choice >>> of >>> the internal space X leads to a different effective theory on the >>> 4-dimensional Minkowski space M3,1 , which should be the theory >>> describing >>> our world." >>> >>> Note the words "... string theory is locally the product M4×X of a >>> 4-dimensional Minkowski space M3,1 with a 6-dimensional space X" . This >>> implies the orthogonality of X with respect to M4. >>> >>> -- >>> Onward! >>> >>> Stephen > > > > -- > Onward! > > Stephen > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
