On 10/26/2012 6:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Well, in defense of Craig, or of the devil, this has not been proved. The problem
occurs, or at least is "easy" to prove only when we make the digital assumption. This
entails a truncation of the subject, local and relative (its mind code) which by the MGA
is incapable to distinguish the arithmetical from the real/analytical or substantial. If
you introduce special (very special) infinities in both mind and matter, a non comp and
materialist theory of mind an matter is not (yet) excluded.
You've mentioned this several times. Can you explain these infinities and how
Also, the comp theory of consciousness makes it effective,
What does "it" refer to?..."comp theory" or "consciousness"?
even in the materialist framework. The only thing not effective is the notion of
substance, and eventually (globally), of physics (that is highly counter-intuitive, but
can be understood in the big 'non physical' picture, where we cannot 'add physics" and
have to retrieve it from arithmetic and/or computer science.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at