Hi Stephen P. King
I think what was meant was the inverse, namely that
no consistent materialist can believe in quantum mechanics.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/6/2013
"Forever is a long time, especially near the end." - Woody Allen
----- Receiving the following content -----
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-06, 15:31:01
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On 1/6/2013 3:14 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/6/2013 11:37 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 1/6/2013 2:17 PM, meekerdb wrote:
So no physicists since Schrodinger are materialists. So materialism can't very
well be "scientific dogma" as you keep asserting.
Brent
Hi Brent,
I think that you are taking as evidence the lack of overt statements as
evidence. Any person that is marxist, for example, is a materialist, by
definition...
So how many physicists are marxists in the philosophical sense. I don't know
even one.
Brent
Hi,
OK, so we can safely discount your claims about "no physicists since
Schrodinger are materialists..." My point is that the lack of a direct
statement in some particular form, like "I am a materialist" does not act as
proof that "no physicists since Schrodinger are materialists". It only tells us
some of the limits of your personal knowledge.
--
Onward!
Stephen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
