Hi Stephen P. King I think what was meant was the inverse, namely that no consistent materialist can believe in quantum mechanics.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] 1/6/2013 "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." - Woody Allen ----- Receiving the following content ----- From: Stephen P. King Receiver: everything-list Time: 2013-01-06, 15:31:01 Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so. On 1/6/2013 3:14 PM, meekerdb wrote: On 1/6/2013 11:37 AM, Stephen P. King wrote: On 1/6/2013 2:17 PM, meekerdb wrote: So no physicists since Schrodinger are materialists. So materialism can't very well be "scientific dogma" as you keep asserting. Brent Hi Brent, I think that you are taking as evidence the lack of overt statements as evidence. Any person that is marxist, for example, is a materialist, by definition... So how many physicists are marxists in the philosophical sense. I don't know even one. Brent Hi, OK, so we can safely discount your claims about "no physicists since Schrodinger are materialists..." My point is that the lack of a direct statement in some particular form, like "I am a materialist" does not act as proof that "no physicists since Schrodinger are materialists". It only tells us some of the limits of your personal knowledge. -- Onward! Stephen -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.