Hi Stephen P. King
I think what was meant was the inverse, namely that
no consistent materialist can believe in quantum mechanics.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
"Forever is a long time, especially near the end." - Woody Allen
----- Receiving the following content -----
From: Stephen P. King
Time: 2013-01-06, 15:31:01
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On 1/6/2013 3:14 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/6/2013 11:37 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 1/6/2013 2:17 PM, meekerdb wrote:
So no physicists since Schrodinger are materialists. So materialism can't very
well be "scientific dogma" as you keep asserting.
I think that you are taking as evidence the lack of overt statements as
evidence. Any person that is marxist, for example, is a materialist, by
So how many physicists are marxists in the philosophical sense. I don't know
OK, so we can safely discount your claims about "no physicists since
Schrodinger are materialists..." My point is that the lack of a direct
statement in some particular form, like "I am a materialist" does not act as
proof that "no physicists since Schrodinger are materialists". It only tells us
some of the limits of your personal knowledge.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at