On 1/6/2013 5:30 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi meekerdb
Materialists can't consistently accept inextended structures and
functions such as quantum fields--or if they do, they aren't materialists.
So no physicists since Schrodinger are materialists. So materialism can't very well be
"scientific dogma" as you keep asserting.
Brent
[Roger Clough], [[email protected]] <mailto:[email protected]]>
1/6/2013
"Forever is a long time, especially near the end." - Woody Allen
----- Receiving the following content -----
*From:* meekerdb <mailto:[email protected]>
*Receiver:* everything-list <mailto:[email protected]>
*Time:* 2013-01-05, 15:37:09
*Subject:* Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On 1/5/2013 6:26 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
Empirical data, to my way of thinking, trumps scientific dogma
(such as materialism) any day.
It's rather funny that you keep assailing scienctists as being dogmatic
materialists
and yet you think their world picture: curved metric space, quantum fields,
schrodinger wave functions,... is all immaterial.
Brent
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2013.0.2805 / Virus Database: 2637/6007 - Release Date: 01/03/13
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything
List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
