Sorry. I don't need 'the 26 dimensions' to explain 'a Block Metaverse Quantum Mind that possesses consciousness'
For me ( as a peasant ) enough one dimension to give the scheme of the primary conditions of existence. ====.. Occam's Razor and the Scheme of Universe. ==. At first I take the simplest reference frame – - the Euclidean space ( 2D). Now I will put a virtual - ideal particle in this 2D. The 2D is a very thin and flat homogeneous space, so my particle also must be thin and flat and symmetrical. Can it be a very thin and tiny limited line- string? No. In my opinion even this very thin and tiny line under good microscope will be looked as a rectangle. Can it be a very thin and tiny limited loop? No. The geometrical form of a loop is too complex, needs supplementary forces to create it. Can it be a very thin and tiny limited circle? Yes. >From all geometrical forms the circle is the most symmetrical. The surface of a circle takes up the minimal area it can and I will write it by formula: C/D= pi= 3.14. (!) But I can put many particles there, for example, Avogadro’s number of particles: N(a). (!) # What is my next step? If I were a mathematician I would say nothing. But if I were a physicist I would say that 2D must have some physical parameters like: volume (V), temperature (T) and density (P). Yes, it seems the idea is right. Then, volume (V) is zero, temperature (T) is zero but . . but density (P) cannot be zero if 2D is a real space then its density can approximately be zero. # What can I do with these three parameters? I have only one possibility, to write the simplest formula: VP/T=R ( Clausius Clapeyron formula ! ) What is R? R is some kind of physical state of my 2D. And if I divide the whole space R by Avogadro’s numbers of particles then I have a formula R/ N(a) = k, then k ( as a Boltzmann constant) is some kind of physical state of one single virtual- ideal particle. (!) # But all creators of Quantum theory said that this space, as a whole, must have some kind of background energy (E). And its value must be enormous. But the background mass of every Avogadro’s particles in 2D has approximately zero mass, it is approximately massless (M). Fact. The detected material mass of the matter in the Universe is so small (the average density of all substance in the Universe is approximately p=10^-30 g/sm^3) that physicists say: ‘ More than 90% of the matter in the Universe is unseen.’ And nobody knows what this unseen ‘dark matter’ is. So, if I divide enormous energy (E) by approximately dark massless (M) then the potential energy/ mass of every single virtual- ideal particle ( according to Einstein and Dirac) is E/M=c^2 (potential energy/mass E/M=c^2 ! ) ( I don’t know why physicists call E/M= c^2 ‘rest mass’ and never say potential energy/mass E/M=c^2 .) In potential state my particle doesn’t move, so its impulse is h = 0. # My conclusion. I have virtual- ideal- massless particle which has geometrical and physical parameters: C/D= pi= 3.14 . . . . , R/ N(a) = k, E/M=c^2, h=0. All my virtual- ideal- massless particles are possible to call ‘ bosons’ or ‘antiparticles’ . These bosons are approximately massless but have huge potential energy/mass E/M=c^2 . But I have no fermions, no electric charge, no tachyons, no time, no mass, no movement at this picture. # ===================.. Now, thinking logically, I must explain all the effects of motions. And. . . and I cannot say it better than Newton: ‘For the basic problem of philosophy seems to be to discover the forces of nature from the phenomena of motions and then to demonstrate the other phenomena from these forces.’ # How can one single virtual- ideal particle start its movement? At first, it will be right to think about some simple kind of movement, for example: my particle will move in straight line along 2D surface from some point A to the point B. What is possible to say now? According to the Michelson-Morley experiment my particle must move with constant speed: c=1 and its speed is independent. Its speed doesn’t depend on any other object or subject, it means the reason of its speed is hidden in itself, it is its inner impulse. This impulse doesn’t come from any formulas or equations. And when Planck introduced this inner impulse(h) to physicists, he took it from heaven, from ceiling. Sorry. Sorry. I must write: Planck introduced this inner impulse (h) intuitively. I must write: Planck introduced his unit (h) phenomenologically. At any way, having Planck’s inner impulse (unit h=1) my particle flies with speed c=1. We call it photon now. Photon’s movement from some point A to the point B doesn’t change the flat and homogeneous 2D surface. Of course, my photon must be careful, because in some local place some sun’s gravitation can catch and change its trajectory I hope it will be lucky to escape from the sun’s gravity love. # My photon can have other possibility to move. This second possibility was discover by Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck in 1925. They said the elementary particle can rotate around its diameter using its own angular inner impulse: h * = h /2pi. So, when photon rotates around its diameter it looks like a string ( open string) and this string vibrates. My god, that is a strange technical terminology the physicists use: ‘ vibrate, vibration’. If I were a physicist I would say no ‘ vibrate, vibration’ but ‘ frequency’, ‘the particle rotates with high frequency’. The frequency is a key to every particle, by frequency we know the radiation spectrum of various kinds of waves. Now I can say: then my photon starts to curl its rotation goes with enormous frequency, faster than constant speed of photon. Now its speed is c>1. We call it ‘tachyon’. The tachyon’s spinning creates electric charge and electrical waves and now we call it ‘electron’ or ‘fermions’. So, in my opinion, virtual- ideal particle, photon, tachyon and electron are only different names of one and the same particle – quantum of light. # My particle is a circle. When this circle started to curl around itself its form changed. Now it has volume and looks like a sphere. What is the law between particle’s volume and energy? I think: big volume – low energy, small volume – high energy. The more speed / impulse ----> the more particle (as a volume) compress ----> the more energy . And when the speed decrease – - the energy decrease too – but the volume of particle will increase. My particle behaves like ‘ a springy circle’ (!) This springy circle can curl into small sphere which must have volume and therefore can be describe as a ‘stringlike particle with vibrations’ only approximately . Springy particle - it means the particle is able to spring back into its former position. In my opinion this is the meaning of ‘ The Law of mass/energy conservation and transformation’ # Once more. Quantum of light has potential energy (- E=Mc^2 ). When it starts to curl around its diameter the potential energy (- E=Mc^2 ) is hidden and we can observe its electronic energy ( E=h*f). But there is situation when this hidden potential energy goes out and we can see its great active power ( + E=Mc^2 ) looking the destroyed cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In my opinion the particle’s transformation from one state into the other was legalized as ‘ The Law of mass/energy conservation and transformation’. # Different conditions of particles are also reason of new situation in 2D. Now the surface of 2D is changed. On the one hand we have the spinning electron ( E=h*f) On the other hand there are masses of Avogadro’s particles. ( kT logW ) The spinning electron changes the temperature of the surface in this local area. Now this local area has Debye temperature: Q(d)= h*f(max) / k. In this space a grain of quantum gravity theory is hidden. The scheme of quantum gravity is: 1. h*f = kT logW. 2. h*f > kT logW. 3. h*f < kT. At first the temperature is going from T=0K to 2.18 K (−271 °C) ( at first kT logW is Helium II ). Then the temperature is going from T=2.18 K to T= 4.2 K, ( kT logW is Helium I ). And then the protons are created. . . . etc. E=h*f - - -> He II - - -> He I -- -> . . . . - - > H . . . – - > Plasma reaction... --> Thermonuclear reactions ...-->......etc. ( P. Kapitza , L. Landau , E.L. Andronikashvili theories). (Superconductivity, superfluidity.) # Now on the one hand we have quantum of light/ electron. On the other hand we have proton. Their interaction creates atom. This interaction is evolving process. # The conception of Time appears as a period of these two actions. ( star formation and atom creation}. ==================.. On Jan 22, 7:45 pm, Richard Ruquist <[email protected]> wrote: > What could be simpler than splitting the 26 dimensions into two groups > that are both superstring theories. It certainly is less complicated > than General Relativity > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 1:38 PM, [email protected] > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Very nice explanation. > > Congratulation > > There is only one small problem: It is too complex. > > If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough > > / Albert Einstein. / > > ==========. > > > On Jan 22, 6:28 pm, Richard Ruquist <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 11:32 AM, [email protected] > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > According to Harold Morowitz a structure of single cell > >> > has 10^12 bit of information > >> > But cells are not in the one and same state, they are different > >> > then another cell has another 10^12 bit of information . . . > >> > ==. > >> > The estimate for human cells in the human body is about 10^14. > >> > The number of cells in the body is constantly changing, > >> > as cells die or are destroyed and new ones are formed. > >> > It means that bits information also constantly changing. > >> > Can this unity between information and cells be chaotic ? > >> > No, we are called this process: ‘self organizing‘. > >> > ==. > >> > About ‘self organizing ‘. > > >> > It is amazing to me, that some can use the term "self organizing" > >> > without shame, to describe mindless objects, in arguments that > >> > claim that the universe lacks both mind and self. > > >> > There just appears to be these massive blank spots > >> > in the thinking of those who wish to see this universe > >> > as containing nothing but mindless objects, denying the existence > >> > of self, while at the same time describing evolution as self. > > >> > It is an inversion of reality, they describe and not reality. > >> > They would contend that the stone blocks of the pyramid, > >> > self organized themselves into a complexity that exceeded > >> > the complexity of the blocks themselves. > > >> > I am sorry, reality really does not work upside down > >> > and backwards, even imagining it does, requires self-deception. > > >> > / By Da Blob / > > >> Regarding self-organizing, In Bruno's words I postulate a Block > >> Metaverse Quantum Mind that possesses consciousness and contains the > >> forms of Plato from which come the principles and forms of > >> self-organization. > > >> There may be as well little quantum minds associated with each 12d > >> universe. But according to string theory, or perhaps my interpretation > >> of it, each universe lacks its own compactification flux or fibrations > >> (whatever) on which MWI type computations can be written. Only the 14d > >> Metaverse has a 4 Dimensional Block Space with such volume-filling > >> fluxes or fibrations for writing both all the quantum state > >> possibilities in the future (so to speak- in the block metaspace the > >> future is a space dimension) as well as all the happenings in the > >> past. This is derived from 26d string theory separated into a 14d > >> Many-World MW Metaverse and 12d MW universes, both containing > >> supersymmetry. > > >> > >> Richardhttp://www.math.mcgill.ca/palka/mgr-fiz-w.pdfhttp://en.wikipedia.org/...) > > >> "These manifolds offer several globally defined forms in terms of which > >> vev-derived fluxes could be written that might drive the super-Higgs > >> mechanism." ...page 147 > >> ofhttp://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/maths/people/staff/thomas_house/the... > > >> > ===========================.. > > >> > -- > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> > Groups "Everything List" group. > >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > [email protected]. > >> > For more options, visit this group > >> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.-Hide quoted text > >> > - > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Everything List" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
