On 3/20/2013 2:21 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 3/20/2013 4:07 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/20/2013 11:16 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
"We are examining the activity in the cerebral cortex /as a whole/. The brain is a
non-stop, always-active system. When we perceive something, the information does not
end up in a specific /part/ of our brain. Rather, it is added to the brain's existing
activity. If we measure the electrochemical activity of the whole cortex, we find
wave-like patterns. This shows that brain activity is not local but rather that
activity constantly moves from one part of the brain to another."
Not looking very charitable to the bottom-up, neuron machine view.
The same description would apply to a computer. Information moves around and it is
distributed over many transistors and magnetic domains.
Let me bounce an idea of your statement here. Is there a constraint on the software
that can run on a computer related to the functions that those transistors and magnetic
domains can implement? Is this not a form of interaction between hardware and software?
Sure, a program to calculate f(x) has to be compiled differently depending on the
computer. Some early computers even used trinary instead of binary. But assuming it's
general purpose computer then it is always possible to translate a program from one
computer to another so that they calculate the same function (except for possible space
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.