On Sat, May 18, 2013 Telmo Menezes <[email protected]> wrote:

>> I don't think D-Wave would be very good at factoring numbers, but that's
>> OK protein folding is vastly, astronomically, more important.
>>
>
> > I think you're underestimating the importance of cryptography.
>

Not at all, without cryptography internet commerce would be impossible; but
I think you're underestimating the importance of protein folding, solving
that problem would transform our world beyond recognition.


> > Arguably, the current bottleneck in health care is economical and
> political, not technological.


If true then rich people wouldn't die from cancer, in fact they wouldn't
die at all, but they do.

> You might be interested in this (extensive) blog post by Scott Aaronson,
> a well known quantum computing researcher from MIT:
> http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=1400
>

Aaronson concedes that quantum entanglement is involved in the machine and
he congratulates D-Wave for being the first to entangle so many qbits;
however he says that D-Wave's claim to have made calculations much faster
than a conventional computer could are at best misleading and at worst
downright deceitful. I have no way of knowing who is telling the truth and
which numbers are correct in all this, but I do know that if D-Wave is
lying the deception won't last long. I hope Aaronson is wrong because if it
turns out that D-Wave was deliberately misleading investors then in the
eyes of many people it will discredit the entire Quantum Computing field
not just D-Wave's approach, and considering the amount of money involved
somebody could even end up in jail. One way or the other we should know
soon.

  John K Clark

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to