In my view, mathematics refers to two things: 1) A private experience of imagined sensory figures or symbols which represent quantitative values and linear reasoning.
2) When applied to public objects, math provides a logic which is derived from the common sense of spatial extension: fixed positions and linear process. Math can be confusing because it is *a subjective representation of that which we perceive as most objective or the 'essence' of objectivity.*Unlike a private fiction, math can be publicly validated. Because math is actually a minimalist aesthetic, it can only produce one dimensional drivers for public objects. For this reason,, a multi-aesthetic experience like human consciousness can never be assembled from single aesthetic effects. Mathematics is effective, and is the essence of effectiveness because it has no affect - no feeling, disposition, preference, or intention. All appearances of affect related to mathematics are derived from the private, multi-dimensional experience of math (1) rather than the (2) motive of math after it has been compiled and reduced to a single dimension public effect. Craig On Thursday, June 6, 2013 6:31:19 PM UTC-4, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > For your entertainment: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=TbNymweHW4E#! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
