Dear Bruno,

I would like to see more remarks from you on how you expect 'the physical
laws' to be defined. I have tried to suggest a method, but it requires a
way to define a means by which numbers can determine both a quantity of
similarity and difference between themselves. I suggest that the notion of
bisimulation between computations can be used...


On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On 01 Jul 2013, at 21:00, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>
> Hi Mitch,
>
> Great comments! I would only wonder why the BB concept is not seen, by
> Susskind et al, as equivalent to the Observer Moment (or Barborian Time
> Capsule) concept. My question is how do they justify the 'memory of a past
> state' of a BB; or do they ignore this? Additionally, it seems that we can
> easily stretch the BB idea into a "Last Thursdayism" concept.
>
>
> I agree. And "physical BB" might not make computational sense, as some
> comp state needs long histories to appear and stay stable.
>
> But it remains to be see, by the math, if deepness and linearity stabilize
> consciousness enough to get physical laws like the one we infer from
> observation.
>
> (Cf my comment to Mitch)
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
> On Monday, July 1, 2013 12:25:27 PM UTC-4, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>> You'll likely hate my comment, but Susskind and Raphael Bousso are or
>> were pretty big on Boltzmann Brains. The more I look at the words of
>> physicists speaking about this phenomena (pro and con) the more it seems to
>> be an evolving theology. Bostrom might also be into this. Conway may not
>> even be aware of BB, and I would guess that Tegmark would laugh it all off.
>> Which maybe he should. I am amzed and sometimes inspired by the discussions
>> regarding this. Questions arise and evolve such as-
>>
>> In an infinite universe you'd produce more BB's them people
>> What about a smaller number of BB's?
>> Would these observers be as described? Having their own personal
>> memories, and personalities, however false?
>> Being of human level intelligence or better.?
>> I asked Dr. Clough if a BB could be one of his Monads??
>> There has been a question asked out there internet-land, whether we exist
>> as thoughs or ideas in one BB?
>> Finally, is our BB, God?
>> One Russian Physicist working in Peking wrote a paper that he saw BB's as
>> likely, but that each cosmos would have it's own BB.
>>
>> It's mind-numbing and perhaps not even worth discussing (?)  I apologize
>> if this is too crazy, but it's what I have been interneting about the last
>> couple of weeks. If Our BB did write a program that eventually created us,
>> that might do it for me. Other's would say no. At any rate, it might be a
>> nice thing to be friendly to our universe's BB, if only to enjoy
>> commincating (if possible?) with such a brilliant mind.
>>
>> BB's were believed by Boltzmann to evolve from thermal differences in
>> space. Sort of like Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy drive producing a air
>> borne whale, falling to the surface of the planet, Magarthea. Or it might
>> be one way to simply arrive, via thermal fluctuations.
>>
>> Well, string drink is called for.
>>
>> Mitch
>>
>>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jason Resch <[email protected]>
>> To: Everything List <everyth...@googlegroups.**com>; foar <
>> [email protected]>
>> Sent: Sun, Jun 30, 2013 11:13 pm
>> Subject: Worth while video
>>
>>  On the subject of reality, featuring John Conway, Max Tegmark, Leonard
>> Susskind, and Nick Bostrom:
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?**v=oyH2D4-tzfM<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyH2D4-tzfM>
>>
>>  Jason
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to everything-li...@**googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.**com.
>> Visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/**group/everything-list<http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>
>> .
>> For more options, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
>> .
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
>
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/R9N68B4A0Y4/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to