Dear Bruno,

I would like to see more remarks from you on how you expect 'the physical
laws' to be defined. I have tried to suggest a method, but it requires a
way to define a means by which numbers can determine both a quantity of
similarity and difference between themselves. I suggest that the notion of
bisimulation between computations can be used...


On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:

>
> On 01 Jul 2013, at 21:00, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>
> Hi Mitch,
>
> Great comments! I would only wonder why the BB concept is not seen, by
> Susskind et al, as equivalent to the Observer Moment (or Barborian Time
> Capsule) concept. My question is how do they justify the 'memory of a past
> state' of a BB; or do they ignore this? Additionally, it seems that we can
> easily stretch the BB idea into a "Last Thursdayism" concept.
>
>
> I agree. And "physical BB" might not make computational sense, as some
> comp state needs long histories to appear and stay stable.
>
> But it remains to be see, by the math, if deepness and linearity stabilize
> consciousness enough to get physical laws like the one we infer from
> observation.
>
> (Cf my comment to Mitch)
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
> On Monday, July 1, 2013 12:25:27 PM UTC-4, spudb...@aol.com wrote:
>>
>> You'll likely hate my comment, but Susskind and Raphael Bousso are or
>> were pretty big on Boltzmann Brains. The more I look at the words of
>> physicists speaking about this phenomena (pro and con) the more it seems to
>> be an evolving theology. Bostrom might also be into this. Conway may not
>> even be aware of BB, and I would guess that Tegmark would laugh it all off.
>> Which maybe he should. I am amzed and sometimes inspired by the discussions
>> regarding this. Questions arise and evolve such as-
>>
>> In an infinite universe you'd produce more BB's them people
>> What about a smaller number of BB's?
>> Would these observers be as described? Having their own personal
>> memories, and personalities, however false?
>> Being of human level intelligence or better.?
>> I asked Dr. Clough if a BB could be one of his Monads??
>> There has been a question asked out there internet-land, whether we exist
>> as thoughs or ideas in one BB?
>> Finally, is our BB, God?
>> One Russian Physicist working in Peking wrote a paper that he saw BB's as
>> likely, but that each cosmos would have it's own BB.
>>
>> It's mind-numbing and perhaps not even worth discussing (?)  I apologize
>> if this is too crazy, but it's what I have been interneting about the last
>> couple of weeks. If Our BB did write a program that eventually created us,
>> that might do it for me. Other's would say no. At any rate, it might be a
>> nice thing to be friendly to our universe's BB, if only to enjoy
>> commincating (if possible?) with such a brilliant mind.
>>
>> BB's were believed by Boltzmann to evolve from thermal differences in
>> space. Sort of like Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy drive producing a air
>> borne whale, falling to the surface of the planet, Magarthea. Or it might
>> be one way to simply arrive, via thermal fluctuations.
>>
>> Well, string drink is called for.
>>
>> Mitch
>>
>>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jason Resch <jason...@gmail.com>
>> To: Everything List <everyth...@googlegroups.**com>; foar <
>> fo...@googlegroups.com>
>> Sent: Sun, Jun 30, 2013 11:13 pm
>> Subject: Worth while video
>>
>>  On the subject of reality, featuring John Conway, Max Tegmark, Leonard
>> Susskind, and Nick Bostrom:
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?**v=oyH2D4-tzfM<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyH2D4-tzfM>
>>
>>  Jason
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to everything-li...@**googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.**com.
>> Visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/**group/everything-list<http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>
>> .
>> For more options, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
>> .
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/R9N68B4A0Y4/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to