On 8/17/2013 10:09 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Don't be so evasive, Brent. Being dense is how science works. It's about stripping away your assumptions. Your assumption is that somehow a sense of smell is an expected outcome of chemical detection, so I ask you to explain why you assume that. You are bluffing.
And you're putting no thought into the problem. Otherwise you'd have realized that smell/chemical detection doesn't have the angular disribution and projective geometry of sight or the localization of touch and so you could have answered you own questions if you'd actually been interested in the answer.
Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
