On 9/2/2013 11:45 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Is it scientific?
As a general principle, determinism is meta-physics. I doubt that it can be strictly
falsified because every possible test depends on auxiliary hypotheses which one might be
willing to give up before declaring a general metaphysical principle was invalid. But in
the sense of having the preponderance of evidence against it, determinism has been
falsified. Quantum mechanics showed experimentally that no *local* deterministic theory
can be right. So the principle of determinism conflicts with the principle of localism (no
faster than light signaling). Determinism can be saved by introducing non-local theories,
like Bohmian quantum mechanics or Everett's multiple worlds. So it comes down to which
model seems best. Bohmian quantum mechanics can't seem to deal with quantum field
theory. Multiple worlds is vague on some questions, e.g. basis, but is still promising.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.