I read through his article. What issue does applying Von Newmann's Cellular Automata solve in physics? It is akin to saying the cosmos is a program and because its based on CA, all else follows that it's now superdeterministic. How would we falsify his hypothesis. What observation can we make? T'Hooft made great progress with his Holographic Universe work, and has not been idle since he won his Nobel. In such a superdeterministic universe, would the Beckenstein Bound on information have meaning? 1 x 10^123.
-----Original Message----- From: meekerdb <[email protected]> To: everything-list <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, Sep 2, 2013 5:40 pm Subject: Superdeterminism Here's a possibly deterministic TOE from t'Hooft. > http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.1007 I'm not clear on how superdeterminism is compatible with the big bang and holographic theory. The latter implies that the total information within the Hubble sphere must have been much smaller when the accessible universe was much smaller. Does that imply that if one uses photons from opposite sides of the CMB to set the angles in the EPR experiment that the results will satisfy Bell's inequality? Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
