On 28 December 2013 17:15, Jason Resch <jasonre...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 11:06 PM, LizR <lizj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Clearly programmes don't have to be deterministic. They could contain a
>> source of genuine randomness, in principle.
> That source, if it is within the program, would necessarily be
> deterministic.  If it is external to the program, then it is more properly
> treated as an input to the program rather than a part of the program itself.
> In practice, computers draw on sources of environmental noise such as
> delays between keystrokes, timing of the reception of network traffic, and
> delays in accessing data off of hard drives, etc. These steps are necessary
> precisely because programs cannot produce randomness on their own.
> I knew that - honest! :-)

I was answering the question as posed. I believe that in practice all
real-world programmes are deterministic, and (more to the point) the UD is.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to