Jason, this link doesn't work...

Edgar

On Monday, January 20, 2014 6:49:20 PM UTC-5, Jason wrote:
>
> It looks like I need to update the database connection information:
>
> http://everythingwiki.gcn.cx/wiki/
>
> If others are interested, I will try to find time for that. I think as 
> useful as any page would be "Bio pages" of members, which state where 
> people fall on a number of questions, and we can trend that overtime to see 
> if anyone's mind's change.
>
> Jason
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Russell Standish 
> <[email protected]<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> Good luck with that! We tried a wiki project a few years ago to do
>> exactly what you propose, but it died of neglect. I'm not sure if the
>> results of that effort is still around, even.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:18:37AM -0800, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>> > All,
>> >
>> > There are obviously a lot of very intelligent members here who are well
>> > read in modern science. I think everyone would agree with this.
>> >
>> > However the usual MO of group members (true of most groups) is simply to
>> > argue for their own theories and to criticize those of others, and as a
>> > result no one changes their views and no significant progress is made.
>> >
>> > Let me humbly suggest that we can do better than that...
>> >
>> > What would really be nice if we could work together cooperatively, in 
>> the
>> > way that actual working science teams do, to build consenses towards 
>> areas
>> > of agreement.
>> >
>> > The way this works is that first we see what we can agree upon, state 
>> that
>> > clearly in a way all can agree upon, and take that as the basis for 
>> further
>> > progress.
>> >
>> > Second work to clearly define areas of disagreement and actively analyze
>> > and clarify them to prune the disagreements to the minimum possible.
>> >
>> > Third, devise mutually acceptable tests to resolve these disagreements.
>> >
>> > Fourth, run the tests and add the results to the areas of agreement.
>> >
>> > Fifth, use this process iteratively to progress to the maximum areas of
>> > agreement possible towards agreement on the most comprehensive theory
>> > possible.
>> >
>> > Now obviously this is probably more doable among small groups that 
>> already
>> > have significant areas of agreement to start with. But as each of these
>> > groups make progress defining what they do agree upon they can then 
>> join to
>> > debate the areas of agreement and disagreement between groups and how 
>> best
>> > to resolve those differences.
>> >
>> > For example I was pleased to learn that Stephen and I agree that block 
>> time
>> > is BS, even though Stephen doesn't seem to actively want to argue that
>> > here. So e.g. Stephen and I could try to clearly define our area of
>> > agreement here and when we clarify that we could then debate it with the
>> > supporters of block time and the UDA who believe differently once they
>> > clarify their areas of agreement.
>> >
>> > My basic point is that instead of just forever arguing our differences, 
>> it
>> > would be great to actively work on defining and clarifying the theories
>> > that we could agree upon. It seems to me that would be a truly 
>> worthwhile
>> > mutual endeavor that would progress all our understandings.
>> >
>> > How about it guys? Anyone interested in working on this?
>> >
>> > Edgar
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>> an email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> > To post to this group, send email to 
>> > [email protected]<javascript:>
>> .
>> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
>> Principal, High Performance Coders
>> Visiting Professor of Mathematics      [email protected]<javascript:>
>> University of New South Wales          http://www.hpcoders.com.au
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:>
>> .
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to