On 26 January 2014 09:53, Stephen Paul King <[email protected]>wrote:

>
>  We now know, given the weight of evidence in support of QM, that
> Newtonian physics is "wrong", even thought it can be used for making
> approximations when we can safely assume that the uncertainty principle and
> relativistic effects are negligible. There are metaphysical assumptions
> built into Newtonian physics, many of which survive into GR.
>

Of course we know it's wrong. I only mentioned Newton because Edgar called
the idea "moronic". Since Newton used it, Edgar obivously thinks Newton was
a moron. I'm sure Newton would have repaid the compliment.


>   One of these assumptions is that objects have properties innately,
> completely independent of whether or not those properties are measured. We
> know that this assumption is nonsense and should not be used in our
> reasoning.
>

No, we assume it on the basis of the Aspect experiment and similar
experiments.


>    I hope that I don't need to duplicate what one can find in any good
> article by, say Jeremy Butterfield, about the implications of Bell's
> theorem. See, for example,
> http://philoscience.unibe.ch/documents/physics/Butterfield1992/Butterfield1992.pdffor
>  yourself.
>
> The arguments against realism in QM critically assume "Bell's fourth
assumption" - that there is some underlying time asymmetry built into
physics. If one throws out this (so far unproven) assumption, it become
logically possible to explain violations of Bell's inequality while
preserving realism and locality.

It also fits in with the block universe cnocept, by the way.

One of the reasons physicists are so wedded to the BU concept, by the way,
is that no coherent alternative has ever been proposed (except for ones
that require extra, unecessary, time dimensions).

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to