Stephen, PPS: Sometimes I get the feeling you just go with the latest scientific breeze?
Edgar On Saturday, January 25, 2014 3:55:21 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > Dear Edgar, > > Strictly speaking, no, time is not a dimension. We define sequences of > associated events to be so in our mathematical representations. > > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Edgar L. Owen <edga...@att.net<javascript:> > > wrote: > > Liz, > > Yes, of course time is a dimension but that does NOT imply a block > universe. > > That is because only the present moment of the time dimension actually > exists. This simply means the past no longer exists, and the future has > never yet existed. Reality exists only in the present moment. > > Thus if we take the universe as a 4-dimensional hypersphere with time the > radial dimension, the real actual universe is only the present moment > SURFACE of that hypersphere, and DOES NOT include the past interior. > > I know you won't accept this model but my point is simply to demonstrate > that time being a dimension does NOT necessarily imply a block universe. > > AND you keep claiming that both Newton and Einstein believed in a block > universe but you weren't able to produce any references supporting that. > > Do you actually have any, or is this just an assumption on your part? > > Edgar > > > > > On Saturday, January 25, 2014 3:18:05 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote: > > On 26 January 2014 08:54, Stephen Paul King <step...@provensecure.com>wrote: > > <blockquote style="mar > > ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
