On 14 February 2014 07:23, Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > Craig, > > I also suspect Bruno's math skills are superior to mine, but his > understanding of the place of math in reality seems pretty deficient, or > perhaps just rigid. > > As I've pointed out his 8 steps may well be mathematically consistent but > that doesn't mean they have anything to do with the fundamental structure > of reality at all. To meaningfully apply a purely mathematical or logical > proof to reality, one must establish an actual correspondence of the > variables in the proof to actual variables of reality. I don't see Bruno > doing that at all. >
What you have to do is show that either his assumptions are wrong, or that he has made a mistake in the logical inferences he draws from them. The "correspondence with reality" comes down to whether the original assumptions are realistic (i.e. accord with reality) or not. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
