On Friday, March 7, 2014 7:21:15 AM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote: > > All, > > An empty space within which events occur does not exist. There is no > universal fixed pre-existing empty space common to all events and observers. >
I agree. > > Why? Because we cannot establish its existence by any observation > whatsoever. We NEVER observe such an empty space. All we actually observe > is interactions between particulate matter and energy. > Not so fast. All we *actually* observe is interactions within our own sensory modalities and meta-sensory-interpretations. What we observe is always a "sense of matter and energy", just as these patterns of pixels on screen are a "sense of English words make of the Latin alphabet". To someone who can only read Thai script, these are just squiggly characters in a foreign language. To a baby who does not know what language is, they are not anything but a lot of graphics. Indeed the "patterns" and "pixels" and "screen" are also another kind of text, read by our lower level senses - through the focus of human eyes, through our body's ability to connect with the kinds of radiation being emitted from the technology, etc. > In fact, all observations ARE interactions of particulate matter or energy, > We don't know that. > they are never observations of empty space itself. > > Thus we cannot ever observe a pre-existing empty space, all we can observe > is particulate interactions which have what we call dimensional > relationships mandated by conservation laws. > > But these dimensional relationships DO NOT EXIST UNTIL THEY OCCUR, and > they are not observed until they are measured. Thus any notion of space > based on these dimensional relationships can be said to EMERGE from > particulate interactions rather than pre-existing as something they occur > within. > > So what we call empty space is really just the mathematical rules imposed > by the conservation laws that govern particulate interactions. It is a > computational structure rather than a physical structure. > > This again is another strong indication that everything really occurs at > the fundamental level as computations of pure abstract information in a > logico-mathematical space prior to dimensionality and prior to physicality, > and that dimensionality is something that EMERGES from these computations > rather than a pre-existing background to them... > Then emergence becomes the only part of the universe that matters, and it is unexplained by mathematics. Craig > > > Now once we understand that dimensionality EMERGES PIECEWISE FROM > information computations encoding particulate interactions we have the key > to resolving all quantum paradox, unifying QT and GR and explaining the > source of Quantum randomness. > > > But no one here is interested in how that happens, or are they afraid to > tackle it? Perhaps because Edgar might be right on this one and that would > be a bitter pill to swallow? We will see if anyone dares take up the > challenge! > :-) > > Edgar > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
