On Friday, March 7, 2014 12:21:15 PM UTC, Edgar L. Owen wrote: > > All, > > An empty space within which events occur does not exist. There is no > universal fixed pre-existing empty space common to all events and observers. > > Why? Because we cannot establish its existence by any observation > whatsoever. We NEVER observe such an empty space. All we actually observe > is interactions between particulate matter and energy. In fact, all > observations ARE interactions of particulate matter or energy, they are > never observations of empty space itself. > > Thus we cannot ever observe a pre-existing empty space, all we can observe > is particulate interactions which have what we call dimensional > relationships mandated by conservation laws. > > But these dimensional relationships DO NOT EXIST UNTIL THEY OCCUR, and > they are not observed until they are measured. Thus any notion of space > based on these dimensional relationships can be said to EMERGE from > particulate interactions rather than pre-existing as something they occur > within. > > So what we call empty space is really just the mathematical rules imposed > by the conservation laws that govern particulate interactions. It is a > computational structure rather than a physical structure. > > This again is another strong indication that everything really occurs at > the fundamental level as computations of pure abstract information in a > logico-mathematical space prior to dimensionality and prior to physicality, > and that dimensionality is something that EMERGES from these computations > rather than a pre-existing background to them... > > > Now once we understand that dimensionality EMERGES PIECEWISE FROM > information computations encoding particulate interactions we have the key > to resolving all quantum paradox, unifying QT and GR and explaining the > source of Quantum randomness. > > > But no one here is interested in how that happens, or are they afraid to > tackle it? Perhaps because Edgar might be right on this one and that would > be a bitter pill to swallow? We will see if anyone dares take up the > challenge! > :-) > > Edgar > Fire away baby. there's always something to agree with in your thinking. For example I agree the present moment reflects an underlying physical dynamic and there's a fundamental sense in which everything local to me is 'processed' in synch to myself and one of the ways that stays in line is via the time dimension an the concept of now. I just don't see a way to make things more concrete than that. In your reasoning. Not mine obviously. My theories near complete, and I've already translated it to an economic/social discovery/correction method. The point being to see it run, because large predictations are made for how things will go. My confidence/laziness is wavering slightly at the edge of the pool on this. What was the first phase went on going on a long time, and it's left me somewhat diverged from some of the alphamale qualities major going at it commercially seems to see as prime. I used to be the beefy prosperous looking guy saying "Come on I'm not hearing it. Say it with conviction, commitment and passion. Say it, let me hear you say I AM A TIGER!!!!" Now I'm the woody allen type repeating "...."I am? a Tiger?"
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
