I agree that the MUH's "predictions" are a bit vague, there's the "continuing to find maths useful" prediction and something about finding ourselves in the most generic universe compatible with our existence, which is not exactly easy to measure. But I guess this is going to be the case for something that's trying to work out why there's something rather than nothing, why maths is unreasonably effective, etc. It's basically philosophy rather than science, and will continue to be until a lot more people have thought about it and maybe someone has come up with some testable results, or someone else has worked out that it's contradictory, flawed or forever untestable.
(But, you know, kudos to him for trying - well, unless he stole his ideas from the Everything list :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
