On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:34:56PM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > Unless, indeed, or just in part, but he acknowledged my work in some > draft he sent me, then they disappeared in the public version, > making him either a coward, or an opportunist or both. (Or under > influence, as it is easy to defame to me to a physicist by saying I > am wrong on Gödel, and to a logician that I am mad in physics (like > "pretending that I "believe" in "parallel world", that's enough). >
Which aspect of your work did he acknowledge in the draft? Was it the FPI result? If it was, he possibly changed it to cite Everett, who conceivably was the first to come up with that mechanism for deriving subjective indeteminism from a deterministic theory. That was the implication in the video clip we watched recently. I wouldn't argue it either way, historically. That still leaves your FPI contribution as original in the computationalist setting, as Everett is not explicitly computationalist. But for Max's purposes, he assumes the Hilbert space is fundamental, so only needs Everett. Cheers -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders Visiting Professor of Mathematics [email protected] University of New South Wales http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
