On 15 April 2014 06:43, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:

>  On 4/14/2014 11:35 AM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
>
>  On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Telmo Menezes <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>   On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:12 PM, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/14/2014 4:51 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>>>
>>>> 3) You assume that going against your simple reproductive program will
>>>> cause suffering
>>>>
>>>> This is a weird assumption. Consider this: you cannot decide to stop
>>>> breathing. Your brain literally won't let you. So evolution did not select
>>>> breathing to be an optional behaviour. But it did select breading to be an
>>>> optional behaviour. Otherwise there would be a whole lot more rape, just
>>>> like in most of the animal kingdom.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  You are right of course that the human evolutionary 'program' is
>>> different from that of almost all mammmals.  But if it were like other
>>> mammmals there wouldn't be more rape.  There is seldom rape among mammals
>>> because the female becomes receptive when she ovulates and readily accepts
>>> males and otherwise she is not sexually attractive to the males.  Humans
>>> and bonobos are unusual among mammals in that females are sexually
>>> receptive even when not ovulating.  This is probably an evolutionary
>>> adaptation to achieve couple bonding which is useful in raising a child
>>> that takes many years to become self-sufficient.  I recommend the book by
>>> Jared Diamond "Why is Sex Fun?".
>>>
>>>
>>  You are right, of course. I got too carried away in that hyperbole.
>> Added your recommendation to my reading list.
>>
>>  Bonobos are very interesting, I've read before about how they display
>> many of the sexual behaviours that are considered "unnatural" or "deviant"
>> by our religious friends.
>>
>
>  That's why we keep 'em out of zoos. Protect the children from these
> deviant freaks of nature unholy! :-) PGC
>
>  Sex between a man and a woman is a beautiful thing.  But between a man
> and a woman and a dog, a goat, and two chickens it's fantastic!
>     --- Woody Allen
>

The meal afterwards isn't bad either. I know it's immoral, but, who can
resist fried chicken, stuffed dog and fricasseed Woody Allen?

Not me and the goat, that's for sure.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to