On 19 Apr 2014, at 20:50, meekerdb wrote:
On 4/19/2014 12:37 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Then, the cultivation of industrial help -- which is not
psychoactive -- was also made illegal. Industrial has a wide range
of applications: paper, fabric, building material and cheap protein
source, to name a few. It threatens several industries and it is
not a narcotic. How do you explain that?
How do you explain that growth of industrial hemp was encouraged by
the government up through World War 2? Did it not pose the same
threats then?
Good question, but it seems to go in Telmo's direction. It shows that
the banning of hemp was indeed purely irrational, and motivated by
making easy money based on lies. it was only a way to impose oil and
forest against a natural efficacious sustainable competitor.
Bruno
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
