The YOU is, of course, getting someone to look at things from a first person 
point of view, as if I was Prime Minister I'd..  I agree 100% that we are ruled 
by plutocrats, what you likely will violently oppose is my observation that 
worldwide both progressives and conservatives rule their perspective 
politicians, and these politically minded billionaires control what goes on. 
Both groups that is, not just conservatives. 
 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Mikes <[email protected]>
To: everything-list <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun, May 4, 2014 5:34 pm
Subject: Re: Evolution from Scripture


Somebody wrote (Liz?):


For example there is no problem with capitalism per se, unless you allow money 
to vote. Lobbying can be permitted, but not through financial helps. If you 
allow this, you kill capitalism, and transform it into corporatism and 
monopolism, which kill the "genuine" competition and eventually the society.




Who is that  "YOU"??  Power and force are in the hands of the plutocrats. They 
do whatever they see fit. Money does not 'vote': people (stupid and 'for sale' 
voters do. 
Capitalism, BTW, as I wrote many times, died in the 1970s to give it over to 
some 
Economical Global Feudalism, (including corporatism and monopolism) - not less 
brutal than the Medieval Feudalism was, only with higher sophistication and 
pretension. The "lords"  OWN things (including Nature) and the "serfs" work for 
money (for them) - sometimes for many many money, like bankers, lawyers, 
legislators, enforcers, scientists, etc. Serfs are disregardable chattel - 
fodder for wars, work-slaves, etc. 
I did try to live in pre- and real nazism, in a (mock) communism and in 
capiatlism, in all of them as an underdog (scientist), twice arrested - but 
survived. 
JM






On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 4:48 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:


On Sunday, May 4, 2014 8:17:29 PM UTC+1, Bruno Marchal wrote:


On 04 May 2014, at 01:14, LizR wrote:



On 4 May 2014 07:22, spudboy100 via Everything List 
<[email protected]> wrote:
 
I shan't defend the behaviors of the Abe religions over the centuries, but you 
couldn't term the Hindu faith as pacifist either. In the 20th century the 
political movement that had atheism at its core, was the Marxist ideology, and 
how many tens of millions did it destroy, 70 mil, 100? Not a bad catchup I'd 
say. The "pagan" faiths, previous to, and coexistent with the Abe religions 
were not pacifist either and were hungry for land, slaves, and murder, just 
like the Abe's, and even worse. Pagan Rome employed crucifixion, remember? The 
ancient Chinese, were plenty, murderous, as well. In the Americas and Africa, 
as far as archaeologists and physical anthropologists, have determined, and 
were,  what I term as being 'genocide friendly.'  None of the species were 
really nice guys for much of the time.. 
 


Yep, the religions known as Stalinism and Nazism were just as destructive as 
the Crusades, etc. In fact anything ending in "Ism" seems to be a justification 
for murder or cruelty. (It looks like Capitalism is catching up with the 
others, and may soon surpass all of them if we aren't careful.)




Some "ism" can be good and nice, but even in that case, after a while, some 
people will use it and pervert it for special/personal interest. Always. Then 
criticizing the "ism" protects them, somehow


 
you're absolutely right 


.


For example there is no problem with capitalism per se, unless you allow money 
to vote. Lobbying can be permitted, but not through financial helps. If you 
allow this, you kill capitalism, and transform it into corporatism and 
monopolism, which kill the "genuine" competition and eventually the society.


 
On the money Bruno. Hey this might be were we finally touch heads  man! It's 
amazing the dogma and self-serving ideological bolt ons currently crept already 
fully into the conception what a free market is. It's barely recognizable as it 
stands at the moment. 
 
A large part of the reason this is possible to happen is because there's no 
scientific theory of economy. . 
 
 


The real war is between the good guy and the bad guy. There is no "ism" capable 
of guaranty the good, but allowing some "ism" to com fairly, allow them to 
evolve and this is harm reduction. Now, if some same "ism" lasts too long, it 
get rotten and as good as it could have been, it will be perverted by some 
special interest. 


 
 I don't think so Bruno, and even if there was, there's no place for morality 
in a theory of economy, not as primary operator...because all that will ever 
get us, is philosophy-guru's into the market next, to tell us  about the 
morality...and among them will be even more bad guys, Which'd be a magnet for 
yet more. 
 
There are bad guys in practice, but the scientific theory of economy...it won't 
just be a theory on paper. The day for that is nearly over now. The shape of 
things to come are theories that no longer embody human guesses any more, but 
instead embody that which can be anticipated once discovered...which will 
always be at the methodological level. And that which must be discovered as 
part of an ongoing unfolding process. All which will attach, to economy, 
technology, physical theory, mathematics, a problem...whatever we 
want....attachment by translation from more abstracted form, attachment by 
intersection, discovery as the product, within in a feedback and other ways 
ever more complex organism. 
 
The theory of economy work its way through markets and industries and nations 
and individuals and abstract theories...discovering principles and strategies 
and corruption..discovering all the time, and correcting. The 2nd Scientific 
Revolution.....that's what it will be. We might not get there though....but if 
we could it be every dream cometh true. But there's a limited window, and if we 
fail, it's hive and hell...the end of us, but with time in the middle plenty to 
have a go at ....being animals



u
But the problem here is not the "ism" itself. The problem is in the human 
addiction to money or power.  


. 
Yep, and all these excellent points, represent manifestations that put a drag 
on maret dynamism....so in effect they are examples of the true character of a 
'regulation'. Not to say some we have now are not crucial unlike what the faux 
free marketers say. They are crucial in a lot of cases because they moderate 
even worse corruption. But any barrier to entry, or disincentive, any kind of 
corruption.....are all directly related to fundamental market properties, All 
of them..all properties. Corruption creates wonders for the people on the 
inside, but across the market as a whole, efficiciency has gone down as the 
inverse exponential. 
 
Not efficiency as it gets defined, because that's not fundamental. Efficiency 
depends on everything else and the relations. Free Market principles are much 
more flexible - yet less so for being  simpler...than misconceptions of our day
...s


To compete fairly needs good separation of all powers, good renewing of powers, 
etc.


Today there are powerful interest fighting against such separation, and the 
internet itself can be in peril. Don't hesitate to sign petitions against it.  
I put links on my facebook page (*).


If we don't remain vigilant, we get the "ism" that we can tolerate until it is 
too late.


Bruno


(*) https://www.facebook.com/Bruno.Marchal24


 
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



 




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to