On 7 May 2014 03:32, John Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > All 101 of my “predictions” are predictions. I looked up “prediction”. > It means: “Something foretold or predicted”. Many predictions turn out to > be false. > > > OK, I won't quibble. Maybe you could list all your predictions which are in the form of Tipler's, that is to say, something like "I predict that when such-and-such is observed, it will have the following properties." I remember he made six testable predictions, some of which appear to have been checked and falsify his theory to a high level of confidence.
This is the only way to separate out your theory from all the others that are out there. Otherwise your theory is indistinguishable from my famous "invisible pink unicorn" theory, which informed sources* say is still tops** for explaining the gaps in the Standard Model. *moi **top quarks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
