2014-05-28 17:45 GMT+02:00 <[email protected]>:

>
>
> On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 3:13:44 AM UTC+1, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>>
>> "To detect someone with Down's syndrome, sequence data is completely
>> useless. "  Please elaborate! I do know of other ways that data can be
>> organized...all
>>
>
> I was actually quoting someone else the. But the confusion is my fault as
> I failed to format things properly. Gene McCarthy - chap I was quoting was
> talking specifically about dna sequence data. Part of what I was commenting
> on, was that while he's right about the data that is there, he overlooks
> that a whole chromosome is missing
>

No chromosomes are missing, there is on the contrary a supernumerary
chromosome 21 hence also the name "trisomy 21".  So I don't understand how
sequencing data could be useless because those datas contains that fact...

Quentin


> for that condition, and a missing bunch of sequence is the same as
> difference sequence.”
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy
Batty/Rutger Hauer)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to