On 31 May 2014, at 10:30, LizR wrote:
Evidence for what? Without telling us, and making clear it is an assumption, this is still a "pseudo-religion" which indeed corrodes science, as I have experience at the front.
Religion per se is a too large word. Only institutionalized religion asks for authoritative arguments, and revelation. Like institutionalized materialism (cf genetics by Lyssenko in the USSR).
To oppose religion and science transforms science into a religion. On the contrary, non confessional theology has to come back in the academy, that's all. The problem is not religion, it is the authoritative arguments. Some atheists club are worst than catholics is the way they dismiss evidences. They confirmed my felling that atheism is just, like Christianism, a variant of the Aristotelian theology.
Science per se is agnostic, on the existence of a primitive physical universe or any other god-like notion. We are only searching.
Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
