On 13 June 2014 15:00, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 6/12/2014 7:05 PM, LizR wrote:
>
> On 13 June 2014 05:17, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Sure it can. Just like Sherlock Holmes can live on Baker St. It's a
>> logical consequence of some axioms.
>>
>
> Try reading that out loud to yourself.
>
> Sounded better than concluding that there is no such thing as our notion
> of existence.
>
> Who concluded that? I never said there's no such thing as our *notion* of
existence, merely that I'm agnostic on whether existence is what you're
assuming. (Meanwhile you're saying Sherlock Holmes' dwelling place is the
consequence of some axioms. Feel free to elaborate...)
Maybe it can, but then maybe the universe can be observable without
existing, too.
"This world, like all worlds, is māyā
But when everything is maya, then maya doesn't mean anything - or more
> accurately it just means "everything".
>
Which is the point of Russell's book, I believe.
I'll let Russell speak for himself.
>
OK. I was letting his book speak for him.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
