On 2 July 2014 15:46, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote: > What would a non-reductionist ontology look like? >
The explanatory chain you gave earlier would look like one if I could make sense of it. > Some kind of Holism. Plotinus talks about "The One", but what good is > that. If you stop taking this stuff so seriously (searching for THE TRUTH) > and think of these theories as different models for an unknowable reality, > then you see that a model with ONE part isn't very useful. You immediately > then have to start explaining why it "seems" to have parts in spite of > being The One. > Any chance of you explaining what you meant without all the waffle? I'm actually interested to know. Please could you start with that diagram which goes from arithmetic to arithmetic and explain how it makes sense, or is reductionist, or SOMETHING. I am starting to get a tronnies feel as I keep asking for clarification and none appears... Anyway I hve to go now kids to feed etc hope to hear somethijng sensible next time! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
