On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 7:06 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List < [email protected]> wrote:
> Sure, even under Bush, Terror won, for the simple fact he was reluctant to > even name the enemy. Terrorism is a method, and not a person, and as you > point out, and BHO and his party, come from a nuanced, progessivist, view, > of focusing on a 'social democracy' which provides goods and services for > the public, and also, the difficulty, paying for such goods and services. > You lack a verb and an object here, as you get so lost in the intricacies of your paranoid labeling, you somehow forget that a sentence should make sense and have a direction. This would be funny, if it weren't sad. > Better to tend one's own garden, then 'waste' needed public monies, and > blood, on useless, foreign wars, eh? The political realm, is now ruled by > the billionaires, worldwide. You mentioned one time, about your opinion > about the folks at Davos (the meetings). I tend to be more suspicious of > them then, yourself, > Thanks for the warning, again. I too am too naive to worry 24/7 about this threat. Thankfully, your paranoia can make up for it. > for a variety of reasons. The old saying 'money changes people' seems to > ring true, for me. > > Against the jihad against freedom, one way, a bloodless one, to degrade > the allure of the jihadist, would be to work on what makes the Muslim wake > up in the morning. > If that isn't blanket paranoid racism towards people that worship Islam globally, then I don't know what is. Thanks for sharing to clarify your radical, one technical step away from extremism, position for everybody. > The afterlife is the core to their religion, even more so then > Christianity, or any other faith that I know of. This is why I occasionally > present, *what must be groan-inducing, posts for you*, concerning > conceptual, afterlives. It could be pure platonic mathematics, or more > dynamically, VR, uploads, cosmological data recovery, whatever? Success, > such as we can judge it would have benefits, for ourselves, > psychologically, but to the point, would act as incentive to* reduce* > Jihad terrorism. > There is no success in fear mongering business. It's a lifetime occupation, as we always need a larger monster. > It wouldn't work on everyone, especially, Islamists, driven only by hunger > for land and power, and yes, identity. > Whoa... I suppose they're much worse than Christians driven by hunger for land/power/identity. > But it > What "it"? You haven't said anything tactically, strategically, or politically precise beyond the vaguest general statements and blanket judgements. > would serve to reduce, by a large fraction, those principally, driven, by > an afterlife of, literally, wine, women, and song; as promised by Quaran, > Soonah, and Buhkari. > > In my nation-state, the US, a majority of the people are willing to hand > over their freedoms for the price of a free phone, a food card, continued > unemployment benefits. It may be time for the peoples of the EU to change > their world view, > Yes, because Europe is just one person in agreement with itself and the same transparent ideology, which can easily be brought into strategic equation, right? > for their own physical safety, as the US, through its progessivist, > leadership, withdraws from the world. In the 1920's this policy was called > Isolationism, and was promulgated by the Right, the > conservatives, nativists, KKK. Today, its from progressives, liberals, > Marxists, true Pacifists, and those who view the US as an evil enterprise, > and here, I speak of some domestic US nationals. > Definitely Fox like, which of course don't have monopoly on this rhetoric... but we need a label to point towards it. Spud, if you had some real intel, then the poorest tactical decision would be to waste it on a forum of "left pinko liberal minions".. But no, it's not really about that... it's about you wanting to recruit or something? Really, what point are your posts making of late? Today's post shows you with your hand in the cookie jar of propaganda spamming, because I don't see any significant point or explicit intel that would protect anyone in some remotely realistic scenario, which would even begin to qualify the discriminatory chickenhawk stuff you need to constantly invoke. Your post doesn't even provoke; I just see your rhetoric parroting general fluff with no direction/strategic value above usual media drivel, as part of the propaganda problem + how easily people are influenced by it. PGC -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
