On 31 Jul 2014, at 05:21, Kim Jones wrote:


On 31 Jul 2014, at 8:47 am, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:

CTM = Comp (to use with moderation when tired of the sound of comp).

Well, it's actually C omputationalist T heory (of) M ind.

That's absolutely correct. Most presentation of it in the literature is a stringer form of comp, as I present it, by making clear that we cannot "know" for sure the subsitution level. So the consequences of the weaker comp applies to all its stronger forms. In particular the primitively materialist one are epistemologically inconsistent extension.

Computationalism has always been understood as concerning the preservation of mind and consciousness when changing a brain, and is different from the digital physics assumption, which assumes the universe is computable, that is, that it results from a one particular program in the UD.

Bruno




Cheers,

Kim

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to