I disagree that

* Artificial intelligence
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence> is the simulation of
intelligence in machines.*

That is, I don't think it can be called a simulation (obviously ELIZA
simulated having a lot more intelligence than it actually had). If a
machine is intelligent, that's the real thing, surely? The "Artificial" in
AI doesn't apply to the intelligence itself, but to the "substrate" it's
running on. This seems to me a semantic confusion on the part of the
article writer.



On 28 August 2014 07:52, John Mikes <[email protected]> wrote:

> Wiki identifies the (non-artificial) base:
> *For other uses, see Intelligence (disambiguation)
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_(disambiguation)>.*
>
> *Intelligence has been defined in many different ways such as in terms of
> one's capacity for logic <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic>, abstract
> thought <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstraction>, understanding
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Understanding>, self-awareness
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-awareness>, communication
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication>, learning
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning>,emotional knowledge
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotional_knowledge>, memory
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory>, planning
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan>, creativity
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creativity> and problem solving
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_solving>.*
>
> *Intelligence is most widely studied in humans
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human>, but has also been observed in animals
> and in plants. Artificial intelligence
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence> is the simulation of
> intelligence in machines.*
>
> *Within the discipline of psychology
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychology>, various approaches to human
> intelligence have been adopted. The psychometric
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychometric> approach is especially familiar
> to the general public, as well as being the most researched and by far the
> most widely used in practical settings.[1]
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence#cite_note-APA1995-1>*
>
> IMO all the substitute "words" mean *themselves*, not intelligence.
> Accordingly the 'artificial' one would refer to simulate *THOSE terms*
> in/by machines. Not the *INTELLIGENCE.*
>
> *I like to use* the word-origin meaning: *'inter'* ligence - *legibility* or
> its variant, to understand "the in-between" what is not verbatim expressed
> in/by the 'text'. Logically, intuitively, anticipatorily, or otherwise we
> may come up in our thinking evolvement.
>
> *Artificial Intelligence *is accordingly an oxymoron. We cannot expect
> from a (any?) machine to understand (use?) the verbatim non-expressed
> (infinite potential) of some (any) content and work with it successfully.
> Yet the term is widely used for 'computers' working in 'meanings and
> conclusions' of the SO FAR deciphered domain of our thinking - translated
> into softwares of that -still-embryonical tool of digital workings we call
> our existing Turing machine. Beyond that "The Deluge".
>
> I do not share the pessimism of the good professor, our machines are not
> (yet?) up to eliminate human ingenuity in the workplaces.
>
> John Mikes
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to