Thanks for the rehabilitation. As I learned in ~1933: Prius cogitare quam
conari consuesce. (I like the relationship between conari and le canard).


On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 7:28 PM, LizR <[email protected]> wrote:

> Oops I should have read your comments rather than stopping to rattle of my
> reply. But I think we agree.
>
>
> On 28 August 2014 11:27, LizR <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I disagree that
>>
>> * Artificial intelligence
>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence> is the simulation of
>> intelligence in machines.*
>>
>> That is, I don't think it can be called a simulation (obviously ELIZA
>> simulated having a lot more intelligence than it actually had). If a
>> machine is intelligent, that's the real thing, surely? The "Artificial" in
>> AI doesn't apply to the intelligence itself, but to the "substrate" it's
>> running on. This seems to me a semantic confusion on the part of the
>> article writer.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 28 August 2014 07:52, John Mikes <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Wiki identifies the (non-artificial) base:
>>> *For other uses, see Intelligence (disambiguation)
>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_(disambiguation)>.*
>>>
>>> *Intelligence has been defined in many different ways such as in terms
>>> of one's capacity for logic <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic>, abstract
>>> thought <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstraction>, understanding
>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Understanding>, self-awareness
>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-awareness>, communication
>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication>, learning
>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning>,emotional knowledge
>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotional_knowledge>, memory
>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory>, planning
>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan>, creativity
>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creativity> and problem solving
>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_solving>.*
>>>
>>> *Intelligence is most widely studied in humans
>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human>, but has also been observed in animals
>>> and in plants. Artificial intelligence
>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence> is the simulation of
>>> intelligence in machines.*
>>>
>>> *Within the discipline of psychology
>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychology>, various approaches to human
>>> intelligence have been adopted. The psychometric
>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychometric> approach is especially familiar
>>> to the general public, as well as being the most researched and by far the
>>> most widely used in practical settings.[1]
>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence#cite_note-APA1995-1>*
>>>
>>> IMO all the substitute "words" mean *themselves*, not intelligence.
>>> Accordingly the 'artificial' one would refer to simulate *THOSE terms*
>>> in/by machines. Not the *INTELLIGENCE.*
>>>
>>> *I like to use* the word-origin meaning: *'inter'* ligence -
>>> *legibility* or its variant, to understand "the in-between" what is not
>>> verbatim expressed in/by the 'text'. Logically, intuitively,
>>> anticipatorily, or otherwise we may come up in our thinking evolvement.
>>>
>>> *Artificial Intelligence *is accordingly an oxymoron. We cannot expect
>>> from a (any?) machine to understand (use?) the verbatim non-expressed
>>> (infinite potential) of some (any) content and work with it successfully.
>>> Yet the term is widely used for 'computers' working in 'meanings and
>>> conclusions' of the SO FAR deciphered domain of our thinking - translated
>>> into softwares of that -still-embryonical tool of digital workings we call
>>> our existing Turing machine. Beyond that "The Deluge".
>>>
>>> I do not share the pessimism of the good professor, our machines are not
>>> (yet?) up to eliminate human ingenuity in the workplaces.
>>>
>>> John Mikes
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to