On 12 September 2014 17:31, Richard Ruquist <[email protected]> wrote:
> Liz, > As far as I know, Max does not have a theory. He just has a hypothesis > with nothing theoretical to back it up. > I'm not sure about that. He does go on about properties we'd expect the universe to have (I think that runs into a measure problem, however?) > One aspect of his hypothesis is that the creation of matter requires math > that is both consistent and complete. > If that is so... > Whereas Godel has seemingly to me proven that such math does not exist. Is > that true? > ...then this disproves it, I believe. I don't know if that is so, however. Also it seems to me that if his hypothesis has this aspect, that is indeed something theoretical to back it up (and indeed falsifiable, as you've just shown). PS Mind you Bruno only requires some very simple arithmetic for comp, I'm told, so is it possible Max's MUH is similar? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
