On 12 September 2014 14:19, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote: > > One counter argument is to note that math has been "unreasonably > effective" in Ptolemaic astronomy, Newtonian physics, fluid dynamics, > non-relativistic quantum mechanics, and other theories which we now think > were mere approximations. This seems much more consistent with mathematics > being descriptive rather than prescriptive. >
Or equally consistent, at least. Assuming that maths is broader than what is required to describe (or generate) our universe, this is equally consistent with the MUH. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
