On 12 September 2014 14:19, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote: > > One counter argument is to note that math has been "unreasonably > effective" in Ptolemaic astronomy, Newtonian physics, fluid dynamics, > non-relativistic quantum mechanics, and other theories which we now think > were mere approximations. This seems much more consistent with mathematics > being descriptive rather than prescriptive. >
Or equally consistent, at least. Assuming that maths is broader than what is required to describe (or generate) our universe, this is equally consistent with the MUH. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
