Sounds like doublethink to me....which was of course a virtue and a necessity if you lived on Airstrip One.
On 16 October 2014 18:21, Platonist Guitar Cowboy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:28 AM, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> I works with "house" and "Brent" too. What's curious is that failing to >> believe in anything implies that you do believe in it. I suppose it goes >> along with the spirit of "everything". If I can think of it clearly enough >> to fail to believe it exists then it must be among the the everything that >> exists. >> > > > If Bp & ~p, then the machine just reasons inaccurately. Believing in > Santa, even though not real (real enough to be minor source of income for > some at certain times of year...), like children that go through the Santa > performance. > > If you believe p while also not believing p, then you are peculiar > reasoner. > > Peculiar machine/reasoning: Bp & B~Bp > > If I remember this stuff... so grain of salt. > > But yes, negation as a whole is kinda weird/curious fundamentally. PGC > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
