On 16 Oct 2014, at 05:28, meekerdb wrote:

On 10/15/2014 7:25 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:


On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 4:00 AM, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote: Bruno seems to think that if you fail to believe in the existence of Santa Claus you must have a definite idea of what "Santa Claus" refers to and therefore you do believe in Santa Claus. A curious inference for a logician.

That's just fancy language, wherein semantic of "Santa" is mapped to "fictitious entity, old, fat, gift giving etc"; so you applying belief predicate to it results in believing untrue fiction.

What's more curious than this is why you choose "Santa" instead of "house" or "Brent" in your example.

But roughly I'd say yes, to negate some proposition you have to know semantic it refers to and point to/represent that idea, with all its possible flaws, and note said negation. And that isn't curious, I'd call it normal because I can't think of some inversion before I have a grasp on some usual state of affairs. PGC

I works with "house" and "Brent" too. What's curious is that failing to believe in anything implies that you do believe in it.

Precisely: atheists does not fail to believe in God: they believe that the notion of God has no sense, but they use only the christian God to make their point.

And to believe that something does not exist, you need a precise version of it. So atheits, like christian (the fundamentalist one) believe that they have the right notion of God. the fundamentalist christian believe it exists, and the atheists believe it does not exist, and as you see, both share the same concept, and defend it up to the point of not studying the field which exemplifies the subtlety of the concept. for the greeks: god is defined by the ultimate reality that we search. It is a pointer of what we don't know about the reason why we are here.



I suppose it goes along with the spirit of "everything". If I can think of it clearly enough to fail to believe it exists then it must be among the the everything that exists.

The concept exist, but both fundamentalist christian and atheists believe that there is no other concepts or definitions possible.

You see the point?

Bruno




Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to