On 17 Oct 2014, at 22:18, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at Platonist Guitar Cowboy <[email protected]
> wrote:
>>>> I ask myself who would INSIST on using the word "God" (and not
some other word)
>>> Which one? I have suggested an other word, like the ONE, but you
did not reply.
>> If the "ONE" is supposed to mean the reason there is something
rather than nothing it might be confusing if it turns out, and it
could, that there is more than one thing responsible for that; it is
also possible that the "ONE" is equal to zero because nothing is
responsible for it.
> So you're open to possibility now in this context and trying to
make humor out of it at least.
Humor? I'm dead serious, a trillion factors may be needed to explain
the universe, or zero factors may explain it because it's just a
brute fact, there is no reason to think that one is more likely than
any other number.
That is semantic. By definition of the "one", it is unique. if we need
a trillion factors, the one will be that trillion factors.
You seem to have a problem with axiomatic thinking. That might explain
why you are so stuck on vocabulary.
> You've been saved by "da Jesus" of Lebowskiism. You're welcome.
I need to find another cowboy who's a Platonist and can play the
guitar so he can translate that from your native language into
English because I don't know what the hell you're talking about.
> our model of marriage/procreation is centered around it, our
concept of justice through prohibition and wrathful punishment using
legal authority exercised by one power, sexuality and the
perpetuated role models, the relation to work, working for merit/
value determined by culture...
u dn't rite 2 good
> Forget omniscient, if Cosmologists are even close to being correct
"God",
Why? Because they won prizes that make all developments/reasoning in
theology throughout different cultures for centuries exclusively
invalid
Exactly PRECISELY.
So you embrace argument per authority, and seems proud of it. I guess
you don't take the time to understand UDA because it is not yet known
well by the community. With such way to think, nothing would have been
ever discovered or published.
It is like saying
"If you are correct you would have got the Nobel Prize. But you didn't
got the Nobel prize. So you are incorrect and we can't publish you".
Bruno
> You sound more certain than most Christians.
Wow, calling a guy known for disliking religion religious, never
heard that one before, at least I never heard it before I was 12.
John K Clark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
