Chris, let me reflect to '2' words. (I never studied QM, have some glimpse
as a polymer chemist, so I do NOT argue against the theory)

1. *Parallel *

In what sense are 'universes' compared to be deemed parallel?
I presume in my agnostic views that there may be many more visions in which
2 systems may be deemed parallel (or: antiparallel?)
They may diverge in time, spacial extension, forcefields, lifespan, etc.
etc.
In my narrative (I never called it a 'theory') the perfectly symmetrical
and equilibrated "Plenitude" (imaginary vision of Everything in balance)
there are inevitably items getting grouped together in a way that violates
the perfect symmetrical distribution (complexities?) and I called those
'universes'. They re-dissipate into the perfect symmetry right as they
formed (in our case: viewed from the INSIDE as a long long time in our
Space-Time views).
Such 'universes' have different compositions according to the items forming
them, at least I did not project/propose any rules to their composition.
We know nothing about the Plenitude (word taken from Plato).

2.a quote from the URL:* 'microscopic'*

*(Quantum theory is needed to explain how the universe works at the
microscopic scale, and is believed to apply to all matter.) *

'Microscopic to what? to our human sizes? to the sub-Planck, or the
galaxy-size extensions?
Again my agnostic views: who knows what "worlds" do exist in quite
different orders of magnitude from our habituel rulers?

Just tasting words

John Mikes




Read more at:
http://phys.org/news/2014-10-interacting-worlds-theory-scientists-interaction.html#jCp

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 5:04 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Sounds a lot like MWI, but asserts that the parallel universe's subtle
> interactions explain the weirdness of quantum mecahnics
>
>
>
> Read more at:
> http://phys.org/news/2014-10-interacting-worlds-theory-scientists-interaction.html#jCp
>
> Griffith University academics are challenging the foundations of quantum
> science with a radical new theory based on the existence of, and
> interactions between, parallel universes.
>
> In a paper published in the prestigious journal *Physical Review X*,
> Professor Howard Wiseman and Dr Michael Hall from Griffith's Centre for
> Quantum Dynamics, and Dr Dirk-Andre Deckert from the University of
> California, take interacting parallel worlds out of the realm of science
> fiction and into that of hard science.
> The team proposes that parallel universes really exist, and that they
> interact. That is, rather than evolving independently, nearby worlds
> influence one another by a subtle force of repulsion. They show that such
> an interaction could explain everything that is bizarre about quantum
> mechanics <http://phys.org/tags/quantum+mechanics/>
> Quantum theory is needed to explain how the universe works at the
> microscopic scale, and is believed to apply to all matter. But it is
> notoriously difficult to fathom, exhibiting weird phenomena which seem to
> violate the laws of cause and effect.
> As the eminent American theoretical physicist Richard Feynman once noted:
> "I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics."
> However, the "Many-Interacting Worlds" approach developed at Griffith
> University provides a new and daring perspective on this baffling field.
> "The idea of parallel universes <http://phys.org/tags/parallel+universes/> in
> quantum mechanics has been around since 1957," says Professor Wiseman.
> "In the well-known "Many-Worlds Interpretation", each universe branches
> into a bunch of new universes every time a quantum measurement is made. All
> possibilities are therefore realised – in some universes the
> dinosaur-killing asteroid missed Earth. In others, Australia was colonised
> by the Portuguese.
> "But critics question the reality of these other universes, since they do
> not influence our universe at all. On this score, our "Many Interacting
> Worlds" approach is completely different, as its name implies."
> Professor Wiseman and his colleagues propose that:
>
>    - The universe we experience is just one of a gigantic number of
>    worlds. Some are almost identical to ours while most are very different;
>    - All of these worlds are equally real, exist continuously through
>    time, and possess precisely defined properties;
>    - All quantum phenomena arise from a universal force of repulsion
>    between 'nearby' (i.e. similar) worlds which tends to make them more
>    dissimilar.
>
> Dr Hall says the "Many-Interacting Worlds" theory may even create the
> extraordinary possibility of testing for the existence of other worlds.
> "The beauty of our approach is that if there is just one world our theory
> reduces to Newtonian mechanics, while if there is a gigantic number of
> worlds it reproduces quantum mechanics," he says.
> "In between it predicts something new that is neither Newton's theory nor 
> quantum
> theory <http://phys.org/tags/quantum+theory/>.
> "We also believe that, in providing a new mental picture of quantum
> effects, it will be useful in planning experiments to test and exploit quantum
> phenomena <http://phys.org/tags/quantum+phenomena/>."
> The ability to approximate quantum evolution using a finite number of
> worlds could have significant ramifications in molecular dynamics, which is
> important for understanding chemical reactions and the action of drugs.
> Professor Bill Poirier, Distinguished Professor of Chemistry at Texas Tech
> University, has observed: "These are great ideas, not only conceptually,
> but also with regard to the new numerical breakthroughs they are almost
> certain to engender."
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to