Spudy: did anyone ever realize a "contact" with those "other" universes, so
you can decry a 'possibility' of such?

Same for 'immortality': did anyone ever meet an 'immortal'?

JM

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 9:23 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
>
> Perhaps this is too much being raised on the twilight zone, but I wonder
> if this provides any means to interact or make  contact with these
> world/universes? This is of course too much to hope for but the study kind
> of seems to direct the mind towards that possibility.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List <
> [email protected]>
> To: everything-list <[email protected]>
> Sent: Fri, Oct 31, 2014 04:05 PM
> Subject: RE: Do parallel universes really exist, and interact
>
>
>     Sounds a lot like MWI, but asserts that the parallel universe's
> subtle interactions explain the weirdness of quantum mecahnics
>
>
>
> Read more at:
> http://phys.org/news/2014-10-interacting-worlds-theory-scientists-interaction.html#jCp
>
>  Griffith University academics are challenging the foundations of quantum
> science with a radical new theory based on the existence of, and
> interactions between, parallel universes.
>
>  In a paper published in the prestigious journal  *Physical Review X*,
> Professor Howard Wiseman and Dr Michael Hall from Griffith's Centre for
> Quantum Dynamics, and Dr Dirk-Andre Deckert from the University of
> California, take interacting parallel worlds out of the realm of science
> fiction and into that of hard science.
>  The team proposes that parallel universes really exist, and that they
> interact. That is, rather than evolving independently, nearby worlds
> influence one another by a subtle force of repulsion. They show that such
> an interaction could explain everything that is bizarre about quantum
> mechanics <http://phys.org/tags/quantum+mechanics/>
>  Quantum theory is needed to explain how the universe works at the
> microscopic scale, and is believed to apply to all matter. But it is
> notoriously difficult to fathom, exhibiting weird phenomena which seem to
> violate the laws of cause and effect.
>  As the eminent American theoretical physicist Richard Feynman once noted:
> "I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics."
>  However, the "Many-Interacting Worlds" approach developed at Griffith
> University provides a new and daring perspective on this baffling field.
>  "The idea of  parallel universes
> <http://phys.org/tags/parallel+universes/> in quantum mechanics has been
> around since 1957," says Professor Wiseman.
>  "In the well-known "Many-Worlds Interpretation", each universe branches
> into a bunch of new universes every time a quantum measurement is made. All
> possibilities are therefore realised – in some universes the
> dinosaur-killing asteroid missed Earth. In others, Australia was colonised
> by the Portuguese.
>  "But critics question the reality of these other universes, since they do
> not influence our universe at all. On this score, our "Many Interacting
> Worlds" approach is completely different, as its name implies."
>  Professor Wiseman and his colleagues propose that:
>
>    - The universe we experience is just one of a gigantic number of
>    worlds. Some are almost identical to ours while most are very different;
>    - All of these worlds are equally real, exist continuously through
>    time, and possess precisely defined properties;
>    - All quantum phenomena arise from a universal force of repulsion
>    between 'nearby' (i.e. similar) worlds which tends to make them more
>    dissimilar.
>
>  Dr Hall says the "Many-Interacting Worlds" theory may even create the
> extraordinary possibility of testing for the existence of other worlds.
>  "The beauty of our approach is that if there is just one world our theory
> reduces to Newtonian mechanics, while if there is a gigantic number of
> worlds it reproduces quantum mechanics," he says.
>  "In between it predicts something new that is neither Newton's theory
> nor  quantum theory <http://phys.org/tags/quantum+theory/>.
>  "We also believe that, in providing a new mental picture of quantum
> effects, it will be useful in planning experiments to test and exploit  
> quantum
> phenomena <http://phys.org/tags/quantum+phenomena/>."
>  The ability to approximate quantum evolution using a finite number of
> worlds could have significant ramifications in molecular dynamics, which is
> important for understanding chemical reactions and the action of drugs.
>  Professor Bill Poirier, Distinguished Professor of Chemistry at Texas
> Tech University, has observed: "These are great ideas, not only
> conceptually, but also with regard to the new numerical breakthroughs they
> are almost certain to engender."
>
>    --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to