Hi Alberto,

You talk of "advancement of society", so this implies some collective goal.
What is the goal, in your view?

Cheers
Telmo.

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]>
wrote:

>  I laugh at the anthropological optimists that are confident that humans
> will be like gods for the same reason that I laugh loudly at cibernetical
> optimists.
>
> most of the effort of inteligent people is devoted to lie themselves and
> other in order to gain power and "enslave" people, at least, to seduce
> other in his sophisticated lies.   The more inteligence, the more chance
> for creation  and destruction. On the average, intelligence alone
> contribute zero to the advancement of society and thus contributes nothing
> to the advancement of anything. It is often the case that dumb people are
> wiser than intelligent people from Harvard of Yale staturated by ideology
> (self-profitable ideology, I could say).
>
> To have intelligent machines either autonomous or not don“t change that
> they could be used for good or for evil contributing nothing, not even to
> the progress of machines.
>
> 2014-11-24 7:45 GMT+01:00 John Clark <[email protected]>:
>
>>
>> > A.I. is no closer than  it was 20 or 30 or 40 years ago.
>>>
>>
>> Of one thing I am certain, someday computers will become more intelligent
>> than any human who ever lived using any measure of intelligence you care to
>> name. And I am even more certain that we are 20 years closer to that day
>> than we were 20 years ago.
>>
>> > But what is new and big is Big Data. But Big Data does not involve
>>> theories of A.I. nor efforts. it's about taking very large sets of paired
>>> data and converging by some basic rule to a single thing. This is how
>>> translation services work.
>>>
>>
>> Well... Big Data computers are artificial and good translation requires
>> intelligence,  so why in the world isn't that AI.
>>
>> > Big Data does not involve theories of A.I
>>>
>>
>> I think it very unlikely that the secret to intelligence is some grand
>> equation you could put on a teashirt, it's probably 1001 little hacks and
>> kludges that all add up to something big.
>>
>> >  It's very large sets of translations of sentences, and sentence
>>> components, simply rehashed for  best fit
>>>
>>
>> Simply? Is convoluted better than simple?  Are you saying that if we can
>> explain how it works then it can't be intelligent?
>>
>> > It actually works fairly adequately for most translation needs. Which
>>> would be great, except this: The Big Data system is not independent at any
>>> point. Every day there needs to be a huge scrape of the translations
>>> performed by human translators.
>>>
>>
>> And human beings move from being mediocre translators to being very good
>> translators by observing how great translators do it.
>>
>> > Human translation professions are in a state of freefall. There used to
>>> be a career structure with rising income and security and status. Now there
>>> isn't.
>>>
>>
>> Translation certainly won't be the last profession where machines become
>> better at there job than any human; and I predict  that the next time it
>> happens somebody will try to find a excuse for it just like you did and say
>> "Yes a machine is a better poet or surgeon or joke writer or physicists
>> than I am but it doesn't really count because (insert lame excuse here)".
>>
>>   John K Clark
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Alberto.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to