On Monday, November 24, 2014 5:59:56 PM UTC, John Clark wrote: > > [email protected] <javascript:>: > > > But what is distinctive about your position, that would not be available >> if our knowledge of what intelligence was had not advanced? >> > > Perhaps a computer could but I'm only human and I don't understand the > question. > > > There's two logical explanations for your position. One of them is >> simply that you are saying what you would be saying if technology had >> advanced but the understanding of how to create A.I. had not. >> > > From a practical operational standpoint the important thing isn't how fast > humans are figuring out how intelligence works but how fast machines are > becoming intelligent. I think it very unlikely, probably impossible, that > any human being, or even any group of people, will ever have a deep > understanding of how the first human level AI works; but that doesn't mean > such machines won't get built, and in less than 50 years, possibly much > less. >
I agree it can happen. But I think it's a hard problem that will need to be theory led. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
